A career year being a year better than previous years.
Giants just need them to be better than they have been.
Huff's first year in Baltimore was nothing great, actually it was probably pretty disappointing for the Orioles. 280/330/450. If that line came with some consistency, it would improve the team's scoring.
Sanchez would be similar, his career line of 300/330/420 with some solid D would probably be enough.
Seems pretty likely that those two could come up with those numbers... Rowand I am not sure about. he also would not need his career numbers, just something in the 275/330/450 range.
And in case you are wondering how these modest numbers compare, check out what the Giants got by position last year (lifted from McCovey Chron):
C - .257/.283/.409
1B - .271/.328/.405
2B - .236/.281/.329
3B - .313/.368/.532
SS - .255/.305/.353
LF - .261/.332/.411
CF - .266/.324/.419
RF - .262/.314/.380
[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Giants ]
Thread:
disagree a little... don't think that group needs to have career years
User account number (uid): 48
Posted by g-drive on 2010-01-11 22:01:23
In Reply to: Re: Giants' roster takes shape with Huff Expected signing should cap bulk of team's upgrades posted by The Dude on 2010-01-11 20:48:45
Posted by g-drive on 2010-01-11 22:01:23
In Reply to: Re: Giants' roster takes shape with Huff Expected signing should cap bulk of team's upgrades posted by The Dude on 2010-01-11 20:48:45

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:
Login with existing account
Create a new account
-