[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Giants ]
Thread:
Belt and Neal as bench players?
User account number (uid): 4363
Posted by Bdogg on 2010-08-26 19:52:00
In Reply to: Crawford unlikely to sign w/ SF unless the G's plan to massively over spend.. posted by Ghost Dog on 2010-08-26 13:48:18
Posted by Bdogg on 2010-08-26 19:52:00
In Reply to: Crawford unlikely to sign w/ SF unless the G's plan to massively over spend.. posted by Ghost Dog on 2010-08-26 13:48:18
Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but if so, that makes no sense. You don't take your two best position prospects and have them come off the bench. They need AB's, and if they aren't going to start in SF, then keep them in the minors.

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:
Login with existing account
Create a new account
-
-